Cases FOR TORT LAW – Negligence DUTY OF CARE



CASES FOR TORT LAW – NEGLIGENCE: WINTERBOTTOM V WRIGHT (1842) – Originally, was there a general duty

in negligence – NO --- C cannot bring tort claims against a defendant for 

nonfeasance that resulted from a contract that C was not privy to.

 C (mail coach driver) was seriously injured when a vehicle broke 

down due to lack of repair. Previously, Mr Wright (D) contracted 

with the Postmaster General to keep coaches in working order 

(safe and secure condition). D failed to comply with this promise 

and this resulted in C’s injuries.

HEAVEN v PENDER (1883) – movement towards a general principle of 

‘ordinary care and skill’ -- facts include, owner of adry lock (D), entered 

a contract with a ship-owner (to supply a stage supported by ropes that 

would be flung over the side of a ship while it was inthe dock. Whilst 

painters (third party), one rope gave way and a painter was injured as a 

result – the ropes had been scorched before they were supplied by D, 

who had failed to give reasonably careful attention to their condition.

LORD BRETT –

“One man near to another”, “Whenever one person is by circumstances

placed in such a position with regard to another that everyone of 

ordinary sense who did think would at once recognise that if he did not 

use ordinary care and skill in his own conduct withregard to those 

circumstances he would cause danger of injury to the person or 

property of the other, a duty arises to use ordinary skill and avoid such 

danger”.

 IMPORTANT TO NOTE THIS WAS THE MINORITY OPINION IN THE

CASE AND WASN’T NECESSARILY BINDING. 

LE LIEVRE v GOULD (1893) – movements towards a general principle of 

‘ordinary care and skill’ -- LORD ESHER – “The questionof liability for 

negligence cannot arise at all until it is established that the man who 

has been negligent owed some duty to the person who seeks to make 

him liable for his negligence. What duty is there when there is no 

relation between the parties by contract? A man is entitledto be as 

negligent as he pleases towards the whole world if he owes no duty to 

them.”

...







LINK DOWNLOAD



CASES FOR TORT LAW – NEGLIGENCE: WINTERBOTTOM V WRIGHT (1842) – Originally, was there a general duty

in negligence – NO --- C cannot bring tort claims against a defendant for 

nonfeasance that resulted from a contract that C was not privy to.

 C (mail coach driver) was seriously injured when a vehicle broke 

down due to lack of repair. Previously, Mr Wright (D) contracted 

with the Postmaster General to keep coaches in working order 

(safe and secure condition). D failed to comply with this promise 

and this resulted in C’s injuries.

HEAVEN v PENDER (1883) – movement towards a general principle of 

‘ordinary care and skill’ -- facts include, owner of adry lock (D), entered 

a contract with a ship-owner (to supply a stage supported by ropes that 

would be flung over the side of a ship while it was inthe dock. Whilst 

painters (third party), one rope gave way and a painter was injured as a 

result – the ropes had been scorched before they were supplied by D, 

who had failed to give reasonably careful attention to their condition.

LORD BRETT –

“One man near to another”, “Whenever one person is by circumstances

placed in such a position with regard to another that everyone of 

ordinary sense who did think would at once recognise that if he did not 

use ordinary care and skill in his own conduct withregard to those 

circumstances he would cause danger of injury to the person or 

property of the other, a duty arises to use ordinary skill and avoid such 

danger”.

 IMPORTANT TO NOTE THIS WAS THE MINORITY OPINION IN THE

CASE AND WASN’T NECESSARILY BINDING. 

LE LIEVRE v GOULD (1893) – movements towards a general principle of 

‘ordinary care and skill’ -- LORD ESHER – “The questionof liability for 

negligence cannot arise at all until it is established that the man who 

has been negligent owed some duty to the person who seeks to make 

him liable for his negligence. What duty is there when there is no 

relation between the parties by contract? A man is entitledto be as 

negligent as he pleases towards the whole world if he owes no duty to 

them.”

...







LINK DOWNLOAD

M_tả
M_tả

Chuyên mục:

Không có nhận xét nào: